|
Here is the case against annuities, as made by
the Motley Fool, business magazines and certain Fee-Only investment
advisors:
1. Tax-related arguments other than that
mentioned above. Capital gains that you make in the market are taxed
at a lower rate when you hold your stocks long enough before
selling, currently a year. The IRS treats annuity payouts as
ordinary income.
2. Most annuities charge too much in fees and
commission. When you add everything in, you do not enjoy the same
low fees over the years like you would through a Fee-Only planner or
Vanguard-style index fund. Annuities also charge you for things like
"mortality and expenses charges."
Don't even think about cashing the annuity out
early - you may pay a surrender charge as high as seven percent.
Then there are management fees, just as with a
mutual fund. Normally they will be lower but still more than those
of an index fund. When it's all said and done, your annual fees may
reach two percent - nearly twice what a Fee-Only planner would
charge.
3. The insurance coverage that annuities offer
isn't that great, etiher. They also don't work out very well as
death benefits. Fortune says annuities are "an inefficient way to
buy life insurance, and almost no one collects on it anyway."
4. To grow your investment, the annuity providers
often use products producing less than stellar in yields. A fixed
annuity means you are guaranteed a certain return, but then it's so
low inflation could overwhelm the earnings..
With a variable annuity, you can decide to a
limited extent how to invest your money. But it will have to be
placed in what amounts to as an in-house mutual funds. Sounds a bit
like the dealings of certain brokerages where not-so-objective
planners direct you to their own dogs?
Another choice could be an equity-index
annuities. You'll be guaranteed a return of several percent, but
your upside is limited, too. If you're a long-term investor, why not
invest in the funds yourself?
5. Annuities tie up your money so you can't
invest it somewhere more profitable.
I According to the Motley Fool, annuities "are
desirable only for those who:
* "Have contributed the maximum to their 401(k)
plans and IRAs and desire further tax deferral on investment gains."
* "Prefer investing in mutual funds as opposed to
individual securities.
* "Will keep the annuity for at least 15 to 20
years." But, let us add here at ElderAdo, that argument is rather
irrelevant to most people who are retired or close to it.
* "Are in a 28 percent or higher income tax
bracket today, but expect to be in a lower income tax bracket in
retirement."
* "Don't need the annuity proceeds prior to age
59 1/2.
* "Are unconcerned that heirs must pay ordinary
income taxes on any appreciation.
* "Desire a 'guaranteed' income for life in
retirement."
The later argument can be very powerful and
persuasive. Remember the tradeoff. When history repeats itself, the
"guaranteed income" will be much smaller than the rewards of proper
investing in the stock market.
The SEC is examining the marketing materials of
the biggest underwriters of annuities, including, says Forbes, ING
Golden American, American Skandia and Allianz Life. It quotes Paul
Roye, director of the agency's Divsion of Investment Management:
"The industry is on notice."
That says it all. If you feel you must buy an
annuity, be certain that the person recommending it is not going to
receive a commission. Boldly ask how he or she will benefit directly
or indirectly from a sale, and watch out for the fees today and down
the road.
RESOURCES
* Annuity Gratuity, Carrie Collidge, Forbes, Feb.
19, 2001.
* Annuities: What's to Like?, The Motley Fool,
July 5, 1999.
* The Money Manager: Finally, a Warning about
Annuities, Carolyn T. Greer, Fortune, July 5, 1999.
* The $6.4 Billion Ripoff, Barron's, March 27,
2000.
Roger Sorensen
America's Financial Guide can be found at ==>http://www.slave2work.com/
Subscribe to Money Basics via
http://www.slave2work.com/ezine.html
Slave2Work.com - Are you ready for
financial freedom?
|